Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Op-Eds... Quite interesting if I do say so myself.

Health bill a huge victory for young adults

The health care bill provides young adults with the most benefits.

Adults 19 through 29 currently make up a third of America’s uninsured. Because of the health care bill’s expansion of Medicaid, 9 million young Americans will now have access to health care. An additional 2 million young adults will continue to be insured under their parents insurance due to the cut off age being extended two years.

Young adults affected with pre-existing conditions will no longer be denied coverage or have their coverage dropped due to the passage of Sunday’s bill. Tax credits will help millions more young Americans afford coverage for themselves.

The much-underreported Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act was passed has a part of the health care package. The Act provides the more help for students and their families paying for college than ever before. Over the next 10 year $36 million will be invested in the Pell Grant program allowing 500,000 students to continue to receive aid. Billions of dollars will also be invested in community colleges.

This article was published at CNN.com and can be found at: http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/03/23/williams.healthcare.young/index.html

Could human life be put on hold?

It may soon be possible to put humans into a state of suspended animation for a period of time and then return them to normal.

Scientist Mark Roth and his colleagues have found way to lower some animals’ metabolism enough to no longer show signs of life. Breath and heartbeat have been stopped with small amounts of hydrogen sulfide in animals such as frogs and zebra fish. Animals have been returned to normal up to 24 hours later. Roth discusses the medical possibilities of suspending humans for small periods of time.

This article was published at CNN.com and can be found at: http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/03/23/roth.suspended.animation/index.html


In China, Bing's turn to show some spine

Since Google stopped censoring its search engine in China on Monday, will Microsoft’s Bing also make a strong stance against China’s ethics violations?

On Monday, Google moved its service to Hong Kong, a city that doesn’t require censorship. The same day they stopped censoring material throughout China. Since this time China has begun to block much of Google’s content, thus leaving a large hole in the Chinese search engine industry (say that five times fast).

Before Monday Google controlled about 35 percent of the market. Google’s estimated 140 million users now have a choice between Baidu, China’s largest domestic search engine, and Bing that currently controls only about one percent of the market.

Microsoft has indicated that it intends to continue to operate under Chinese laws. They insist that Microsoft continually tries to promote freedom of speech and Internet privacy wherever they operate. But the question remains-- does a company stand up to China’s questionable human rights policy or does it continue to exploit China’s 400 million Internet users? Google did the right thing in my mind.

This article was published at CNN.com and can be found at: http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/03/24/mackinnon.google.china/index.html

Friday, March 12, 2010

Sources!

1. This source deals with the history of environmentalism as a political issue. It also shows how the two main parties have changed their platforms in regard to energy policy and environmentalism. I found this source to be very helpful and will be using it in my paper. (Peer-reviewed)

http://web.ebscohost.com.weblib.lib.umt.edu:8080/ehost/detail?vid=3&hid=7&sid=fb3dbfb3-1812-442f-97da-9b3a391a63af%40sessionmgr13&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=34054384

2.This paper is concerned with the voting pattern of congressional members as it relates to environmental issues. The paper hypothesizes that race in a major factor in how members of congress vote on climate change legislation. I’m not sure how much of this source will be used in my paper but there is some information that I found relevant to my topic. (Peer-reviewed)

http://web.ebscohost.com.weblib.lib.umt.edu:8080/ehost/detail?vid=3&hid=7&sid=fb3dbfb3-1812-442f-97da-9b3a391a63af%40sessionmgr13&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=6194791

3. Environmental policy is used as a way of determining if the Democratic and Republican parties are drifting apart or coming together in this source. The paper discusses a few social factors that often lead to lead to a person political ideology. (Peer-reviewed)

http://web.ebscohost.com.weblib.lib.umt.edu:8080/ehost/detail?vid=4&hid=7&sid=fb3dbfb3-1812-442f-97da-9b3a391a63af%40sessionmgr13&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=5070091

4. This article discusses the United States decision not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol and Canada decision to do the opposite. It also talks a little about George W. Bush’s ideas on climate change. Although I found some useful information in this article, I would like to find something that focuses more on Bush’s policies. (Peer-reviewed)

http://web.ebscohost.com.weblib.lib.umt.edu:8080/ehost/detail?vid=7&hid=7&sid=fb3dbfb3-1812-442f-97da-9b3a391a63af%40sessionmgr13&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=27759987

5. I have seen An Inconvenient Truth before and think it gives a strong counter argument to the policies enacted by the Bush administration. I will use Gore and Bush to show the extreme differences between the major parties’ view on climate change.

Movie: An Inconvenient Truth

6. This news article talks about Obama’s challenges and strategies for tackling his energy proposal. I well need a few more sources pertaining to President Obama’s positions on climate change, environmentalism, and sustainability

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/05/obama.energy/index.html?iref=allsearch

.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Sustainability: A Political Time Bomb

Hi Molly,

I would like to write my personal essay on how sustainability has become political issue. Sustainability, to me anyway, seems like an issue that would have wide ranging bipartisan support because it benefits everyone: rich or poor, white or black, gay or straight. This is not the case. I would like to research why there is such a divide on Capitol Hill. I love politics and personally identify more with Democrats on social issues like sustainability but I will do my best correctly portray the Republicans stance on this issue. I have previously written a paper similar to this but politics was a side note rather than the main topic. I have a genuine interest in both sustainability and politics (I’m a political junkie, weird I know) and really look forward to researching this topic. By the way, congratulations on your raw food diet! You have WAY more will power than I.

Happy Tuesday,

Blake